About Me


Name::ron st.amant
From::Toronto, Ontario, CA
I'm an American living in Canada because my wife made me...no, no it was my choice...see honey, I said it! In September of '05 we had our first child and the rollercoaster got even more scary. Oh and I'm probably coughing...or complaining about it.
View my complete profile

Recent Posts

While My Guitar Gently Sleeps
Wide Awake
Answers to first batch of Birthday Suggestions
Ain't It The Life
1 Post, 2 Essays, and a Multitude of Boredom
Who's Gonna Save Me??
I Must Have Left It Outside With My Etiquette
You Don't Need A Weather Man To Know Which Way the...
Fire Bad, Tree Pretty
The Adventures of Socks the Monkey in the Great Pu...

Archives

April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007

Monday, October 23, 2006

Andrew Sullivan | The Daily Dish: Madison's Conservatism of Doubt

Andrew Sullivan | The Daily Dish: Madison's Conservatism of Doubt Ooo...I made the big time (or Time) as it were. I'm the 'reader' in question and Andrew graciously reprinted my remarks. If I'm accepted into a PhD program at McMaster, I'll be focusing on the history of the American Constitution as my primary field [some other program at another University might change that]. As such I'm a deep Madisonian. In American political history it is common to divide the 18th and 19th century political movement between Hamiltonians and Jeffersonians- and there is a great amount of truth in that dichotomy- they were the standard bearers for the Federalist and Republican 'parties' in the early 19th century (I use quotations because neither would have openly embraced the idea they led, or were inspirations for 'party' politics, yet they were). While the influence of Hamilton and Jefferson survived for generations beyond their own, it is Madison, in my opinion, whose influence is still with us. Perhaps this is so because he was, if not the conduit for both men and their ideas, then at least the first true pragmatist in the post-Revolution era. He combined the hope (and fears) of Jefferson and the Republicans, with the strong centralization behind Hamiliton's political leanings. It was Madison who defined the Constitution as an effort to "form a more perfect union" which in itself is the evidence of his conservatism of doubt, infused with the politics of hope. He realized that humans were imperfect creatures thus in need of government, but a government that "We the People" designed. There is hardly a political fight today that could not use some insight from a close reading of The Federalist Papers. The genius of Madison is that he understood the passions of ideology, and the dangers of absolutism- no more proof is needed than his firm challenge to his father-figure, Jefferson, over Jefferson's support of the French Revolution. In short, Madison could see radicalism before others could.

---------------------------------------------

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home